各種加熱管-各種電熱管-各種電熱管-各種電熱管

各種加熱管

新型電加熱管

If adopted this view

Will give the court randomly create conditions of power

And under these conditions

They can be thought of as a determined case or a series of determined case is authoritative

If the case is just prove what is legal evidence

Then the court must decide in different circumstances should give the evidence to the importance of what

Consistent with this view

Justice Kent (Kent) also pointed out

A former ruling needn’t to go on in the future

If you can show that

Who in the specific case

The law misunderstood or misused

This view is fundamentally contrary to maintain that precedent constitute legal source view

Unless the term source of law is not strict and not the use of special sense

This approach precedent’s point of view

Criticism as

John

Austin (John Austin) according to Jeremy? Bentham (Jeremy Bentham)

Proposed the severe criticism for this view

He called this view used by judges in our country juvenile fiction

The trial law or common law is not their

But a nonhuman supernatural things

I guess

It is eternal

And the method of palace just in statement it from time to time

John? Mr Salmond (John Mr Salmond)